矿业企业ESG表现的价值效应:基于双重视角的实证研究

    Value effects of ESG performance in mining enterprises: an empirical study based on dual perspectives

    • 摘要: 矿业企业的环境、社会与治理(ESG)表现日益受到关注现有研究系统评估了ESG表现对企业价值的影响,但未能在厘清账面价值和市场价值不同估值逻辑的基础上,充分揭示ESG表现影响矿业企业价值的作用机理与传导路径。为此,本文以2016—2025年我国A股上市矿业企业为样本,运用双向固定效应模型与中介效应模型,实证检验ESG表现对矿业企业账面价值和市场价值的影响,并考察政府补助和融资约束在其中的中介效应及不同产权性质与主营业务类型下企业的异质性表现。实证结果表明:①ESG表现对矿业企业账面价值具有显著正向影响,但对市场价值则呈现显著负向影响,揭示了ESG价值效应的非对称性;②政府补助在ESG表现影响账面价值与市场价值的两条路径中均发挥部分中介效应;融资约束在账面价值路径中呈现遮掩效应,在市场价值路径中发挥部分中介作用;③非国有矿企的市场价值对ESG表现的敏感性显著高于国有矿业企业,化石能源开采企业的账面价值对ESG表现的响应强度相较于关键金属开采企业及其他矿业企业更高。建议构建差异化的绿色金融与财政扶持体系、完善矿业ESG信息披露规范与加强市场预期管理、强化转型资金用途监管及推动安全、环保与ESG一体化协同治理,以实现ESG实践向企业可持续价值转化。

       

      Abstract: Environmental, social, and governance(ESG) performance of mining enterprises has attracted increasing attention. While existing literature systematically explores the impact of ESG performance on corporate value, prior studies often fall short of distinguishing the distinct valuation logics of book value versus market value. Consequently, the underlying mechanisms and transmission pathways through which ESG performance affects mining companies remain insufficiently understood. Therefore, this paper examines a sample of China’s A-share listed mining enterprises from 2016 to 2025. Utilizing the two-way fixed effects model and the mediating effect model, it evaluates how ESG performance impacts both book and market values. Furthermore, the research explores the mediating effects of government subsidies and financing constraints, as well as the heterogeneous effects across enterprises with varying ownership structures and primary business types. The empirical findings reveal an asymmetric value effect: ESG performance has a significant positive effect on the book value of mining enterprises, but has a significant inhibitory effect on the market value. Mechanism analysis indicates government subsidies play a partial mediating effect in the two paths of ESG performance affecting book value and market value; financing constraints exert a significant suppression effect in the book value path, and play a partial mediating effect in the market value path. Additionally, heterogeneity analysis shows that the market value of non-state-owned mining enterprises is more sensitive to ESG performance, whereas the book value of fossil fuel mining enterprises responds more intensely. Based on these findings, this paper recommends constructing a differentiated green finance and fiscal support framework, refining ESG disclosure standards and market expectations management for the mining sector, strengthening the supervision of transformation funds allocation, and promoting integrated collaborative governance across safety, environmental protection, and ESG in order to facilitate the transformation of ESG practices into sustainable corporate value.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回