绿色矿产国际经贸合作政策话语的演化特征与治理逻辑

    Analysis on policy discourse on international economic and trade cooperation on green mining and minerals: evolutionary characteristics and governance logic

    • 摘要: 在全球绿色低碳转型与供应链加速重构的背景下,绿色矿产国际经贸合作日益成为资源开发、产业安全与全球治理交汇的重要议题。本文以2011—2026年美国、澳大利亚、加拿大和欧盟四个经济体发布的10 593篇政策文本为研究对象,综合运用语料库分析、词典与规则型情感分析(VADER)和批评话语分析方法,从议题结构、时序演化、情感特征、治理逻辑等方面开展比较研究。研究发现,四个经济体的相关政策话语主要围绕能源转型、资源开发、贸易投资、供应链安全、责任治理和规则建构展开,并呈现由负责任供应链和绿色低碳转型向供应链韧性、制度规制与战略合作不断拓展的演化趋势;不同经济体基于资源禀赋、产业定位和治理传统,形成了各具侧重的政策话语和治理取向,其中,美国更突出安全竞争与规则约束,澳大利亚更重视资源供给与产业开发,加拿大更强调责任治理与合作发展,欧盟则更侧重制度规制与市场治理。不同治理取向的并存反映出当前绿色矿产国际经贸合作在治理目标、规则标准和多边协调等方面仍存在分歧。中国应进一步推动多边合作与规则衔接,完善覆盖矿产全生命周期的绿色治理体系,加强对不同经济体政策规则和合作风险的差异化应对,提升参与全球绿色矿产治理的能力。

       

      Abstract: As the global green and low-carbon transition as well as restructuring of supply chains accelerates, international economic and trade cooperation on green mining and minerals has increasingly become an important issue at the intersection of resource development, industrial security, and global governance. This study examines 10 593 policy texts issued by the United States, Australia, Canada, and the European Union from 2011 to 2026. Using corpus analysis, Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner(VADER), and critical discourse analysis, it conducts a comparative investigation of issue structures, diachronic evolution, sentiment features, and governance logics. The findings show that the policy discourses of the four economies primarily focus on energy transition, resource development, trade and investment, supply-chain security, responsible governance, and rule-making, while gradually expanding from responsible supply chains and the green and low-carbon transition toward supply-chain resilience, institutional regulation, and strategic cooperation. Shaped by differences in resource endowments, industrial positioning, and governance traditions, the four economies exhibit distinct policy emphases and governance orientations: the United States places greater emphasis on strategic competition and regulatory constraints; Australia prioritizes resource supply and industrial development; Canada stresses responsible governance and cooperative development; and the European Union focuses more on institutional regulation and market governance. The coexistence of these different governance orientations reveals continuing divergences in governance objectives, regulatory standards, and multilateral coordination in international economic and trade cooperation on green minerals. China should further promote multilateral cooperation and regulatory alignment, improve a green governance system covering the entire mineral life cycle, strengthen differentiated responses to the policy rules and cooperation risks of different economies, and enhance its capacity to participate in global green mineral governance.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回