煤矿关闭退出的国内外比较及若干问题探讨

    Comparison of coal mine closure and withdrawal and some problems discussion

    • 摘要: 在新常态的大背景下,我国2016年开始了新一轮的煤矿关闭退出,这对于煤炭行业健康可持续发展和经济社会平稳发展都具有重要意义。本文总结了德国、美国等国家煤矿关闭退出的主要做法,从关闭退出的背景、煤炭产业结构和产权结构、关闭退出的强度三个方面,对比了我国新一轮煤矿关闭退出与国外煤矿关闭退出的差异性,认为这一轮关闭退出历时短、强度大,具有很强的中国特色和时代背景。在此基础上,探讨了我国在煤矿关闭退出过程中要重点关注退出标准制定、退出引发的煤炭价格波动以及政府行为界定三个方面的问题,提出了制定出台煤矿关闭退出条例及相关的司法解释等四条政策建议。

       

      Abstract: Under the background of the new normal economy, China begins a new round of coal mine closure and withdrawal in 2016, which is of great significance for the healthy and sustainable development of the coal industry and economic and social stability.This paper summarizes the main methods of coal mine closure and withdrawal in Germany and the United States of America.From the background of the closure and withdrawal, the structure of coal industry and property rights, and the intensity of the closure and withdrawal, the differences between China's new round of coal mine closure and foreign coal mine closure and withdrawal are compared emphatically.It is believed that this round of closure and withdrawal takes a short time.On this basis, this paper discusses three problems that should be paid more attention to in the process of coal mine closure and withdrawal in China:the delimitation of withdrawal standard, the fluctuation of coal price caused by withdrawal and the definition of government action, and puts forward the formulation and promulgation of regulations on coal mine closure and withdrawal and related issues, judicial interpretation and other four policy recommendations.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回