民法典视域下矿业侵权的司法认定与制度完善

    The judicial confirmation and system improvement of mining infringement from the perspective of the Civil Code

    • 摘要: 自《民法典》2021年1月1日生效后,环境侵权作为侵权责任编的一个重要分支,其规则更加深入细致,在传统侵权责任法律体系下难以在判决中体现的内容,如惩罚性赔偿、生态修复、调查费用等,都有了新的解决方案。若以《民法典》的规则思维回顾以往矿业权行使导致生态环境损害的案件,不难发现在案件处理结果上有很大差异,矿业权人侵害生态环境所承担的法律责任将更重,这对于保护生态环境非常有利。但是,由于《民法典》规定较为原则化,具体实施细则尚未出台,故办理矿业权行使导致生态环境损害之案件时,尚有一些争议之处。实践中,建议按照惩罚倍数的判断、计算基数的确定、损害鉴定的费用、调查费用的计算、预防费用的支出、诉讼主体的厘定等几个方面加以处理,以便准确认定相关侵权责任。

       

      Abstract: The rules of environmental infringement had been further detailed as an important branch of the compilation of tort liability since the Civil Code took effect on January 1, 2021.The content that cannot be reflected easily in sentence under the traditional tort liability law system, such as punitive damages, ecological restoration and investigations’ cost, having already got new solutions.It is not difficult to find that there are such big difference on processing results if we review the previous ecological environmental damage cases because of exercising mining rights with the logic of the Civil Code, which shall be much more heavy legal responsibility to bear as to destroying ecological environment.In fact, it’s great for protection of ecological environment.However, due to the principled Civil Code’s regulations and specific implementation rules having not been enacted, there are some controversy when handling those cases.The solutions to the problem are proposed to judge multiple punishment, confirming the calculation base, calculating the cost of damage identification, investigation, prevention expenditures and determing the legal relationship, in order to identify tort liability accurately.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回