废弃矿山生态修复成效评估指标体系的构建研究:以深圳市某废弃矿山生态修复成效评估为例

    A study on the construction of an ecological restoration effectiveness evaluation system for abandoned mines: exemplified by the ecological index restoration effectiveness evaluation in an abandoned mine in Shenzhen City

    • 摘要: 成效评估是实施生态修复监督的重要手段,合理运用评估成果有利于生态修复质量持续发挥效益,而构建科学合理的评估指标体系是开展成效评估工作的基础,也是该研究的关键。废弃矿山生态修复是助力“两山”实践创新和实施“双碳”战略的重要举措,为科学评估废弃矿山生态修复成效,本研究基于废弃矿山生态修复工程建设目标和特点,坚持生态修复以生态效益为核心、兼顾社会经济效益和成效维护的客观实际,按照评价指标适用性、评价方法规范性、指标数据易获取性原则,从生态效益、社会经济效益和成效维护三个方面构建了废弃矿山生态修复成效评估指标体系,涵盖重要生态系统面积、植被覆盖度、环境质量等十项具体评价指标,并选取深圳市某废弃矿山生态修复工程实践开展成效评估。结果显示:评估得分为88.2分,成效等级为良好,其中,生态效益和社会经济效益得分率均在95%以上,说明生态修复总体达到了格局优化、质量改善、功能提升、风险相对较低的生态效益目标,并带来了较好的社会经济效益;成效维护较差,存在问题为后期管护不足和未开展跟踪监测。通过案例应用证明,该研究构建的评估指标体系具有较好的适用性,评估结果能够客观、真实、准确地表征生态修复效果,可为其他废弃矿山生态修复成效评估提供经验借鉴,也为进一步推进我国生态修复成效评估工作提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Effectiveness evaluation is a key tool for supervising ecological restoration. Applying evaluation findings rationally helps sustain restoration benefits, while developing a scientifically sound evaluation index system forms the essential foundation and a critical focus of this work. Ecological restoration of abandoned mines is vital for advancing the practical application of the “two mountains” theory concept and implementing the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” strategy. To evaluate this restoration scientifically, this study establishes an evaluation index system based on the objectives and characteristics of abandoned mine projects. Guided by the principles of prioritizing ecological benefits while balancing socio-economic gains and long-term sustainability, and adhering to criteria of indicator applicability, methodological standardization, and data accessibility, the system encompasses three dimensions: ecological benefits, socio-economic benefits, and effectiveness maintenance. It includes ten specific indicators, such as key ecosystem area, vegetation coverage, and environmental quality. The system is tests using a case study of an abandoned mine restoration project in Shenzhen City. The evaluation yields an overall score of 88.2, classifies the project as “good”. Notably, both ecological and socio-economic benefits score above 95%, indicating the project successfully achieved its core ecological goals—optimizing landscape patterns, improving environmental quality, enhancing ecosystem functions, and mitigating risks—while generating significant socio-economic returns. However, effectiveness maintenance scored poorly, revealing issues like inadequate post-restoration management and insufficient long-term monitoring. The case study confirms the high applicability of the proposed index system. Its results objectively, accurately, and reliably reflect restoration outcomes. This system provides valuable insights for evaluating other abandoned mine restoration projects and offers a practical reference for advancing ecological restoration evaluation practices nationwide.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回