《矿产资源法》与《能源法》之联系、共性与区别:以领域法系统工程对立法之影响为视角

    The relationship, commonalities, and differences between the Mineral Resources Law and the Energy Law: a perspective on the impact of domain law systems engineering on legislation

    • 摘要: 《矿产资源法》和《能源法》是领域立法的典型范式。领域法作为应对复杂社会问题的一种新型法治模式,在系统思维方式的指引下,强调法律体系的整体关联性、结构功能性和动态调整性。自此视角对两法之间的关系进行考察,能更好地梳理和分析两者之间的联系、共性和区别。首先,多数重要、核心的能源均为矿产资源,且新能源的开发利用又依赖大量矿产资源的使用,此为两法之间存在关联的前提和基础。同时,两法的公私法融合属性要求其在具体制度构建中应当统筹好有效市场和有为政府之关系,强化系统观念,形成高效协同配置资源的合力,故相关法律规范之间具有密切关联性。其次,两法虽然都立足于保障国家安全、加强生态保护、深化市场改革等目标,但基于各自功能定位和规制路径的不同,在具体制度构建和内容安排上存在差异。如《矿产资源法》侧重矿产资源的开发与保护,尤其体现在矿业权管理、生态修复等方面;而《能源法》则更加关注能源转化、利用及消费,能源产业结构优化和能源绿色低碳转型等问题。最后,两法在易受政策导向、国际趋势和技术革新等因素的影响方面存在共性,均需根据具体形势变化进行适应性的动态调整。通过对两法的比较与分析,以期为统筹推进两法协同实施提供方向和指引,为建立健全两法实施细则和配套制度提供依据和支撑。

       

      Abstract: The Mineral Resources Law and the Energy Law are examples of domain-based legislation. As an emerging legal framework addressing complex societal challenges, domain law, underpinned by systems thinking, emphasizes the overall coherence, structural functionality, and dynamic adaptability of the legal system. Analyzing the relationship between these two laws from this perspective enables a clearer understanding of their interconnections, commonalities, and differences. Firstly, most key and primary energy sources are mineral resources, and the development and utilization of new energy heavily depend on the use of these mineral resources. This establishes the foundational link between the two laws. Furthermore, both laws exhibit an integration of public and private law elements, necessitating a balance between an effective market and active government in the design of specific legal frameworks. This approach reinforces a systems-oriented perspective and fosters a synergistic force for the efficient and coordinated allocation of resources, thereby ensuring a close interrelationship among the relevant legal provisions. Secondly, although both laws aim to safeguard national security, enhance ecological protection, and advance market reforms, they diverge in their functional orientation and regulatory pathways. The Mineral Resources Law primarily focuses on the development and protection of mineral resources, particularly in areas such as mining rights management and ecological restoration, whereas the Energy Law addresses issues related to energy conversion, utilization, consumption, optimization of energy industry structure, and the green and low-carbon transformation of the energy sector. Lastly, both laws are subject to the influence of policy directions, international trends, and technological innovations, requiring adaptive, dynamic adjustments in response to evolving circumstances. Through a comparative analysis of these two laws, this article seeks to provide strategic guidance for their coordinated implementation, offering a foundational basis and support for the development of detailed implementation regulations and supplementary institutional frameworks.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回