《矿产资源法》第1条的实践意义

    The practical significance of article 1 of the Mineral Resources Law

    • 摘要: 矿业高质量发展衍生的制度需求揭示出旧《矿产资源法》与实践之间存在制度性落差,赋予立法目的变革的内生动力。2024年《矿产资源法》修订后的第1条通过系统性重构为矿产资源法治体系革新提供了立法目的支撑,是矿产资源法治体系建设的逻辑原点与价值锚点,是我国矿产资源领域从传统治理模式向现代治理范式迈进的重要制度体现。新法第1条通过递进式表述,嵌入“资源安全”“环境保护”及“权益平衡”三大要素,与时俱进地优化矿产资源领域发展的基础目标与战略目标,勾勒出全方位、立体化的矿产资源治理框架。立法目的条款的价值转向推动立法目的功能的延伸,驱动制度功能从基础宣示向实践指引升级。立法层面为《矿产资源法》内部制度构建与外部规范衔接提供价值基准,统摄法律修订的体系整合与动态调适,引领矿产资源法律规范体系的完善优化;执法层面为行政规范制定与执法权力运行划定边界,依托制度保障推动执法机制转型,强化治理效能提升与法治秩序维护的双重功效;司法层面为法律适用统一与个案公平兼顾夯实理念基础,通过利益衡量机制达成形式正义与实质正义的协调平衡;普法层面为优化政府治理逻辑与企业合规运营导引实践路径,塑造政府依法决策、企业依法经营的协同治理格局。

       

      Abstract: The institutional demands arising from the high-quality development of the mining industry reveal an institutional gap between the old Mineral Resources Law and practical realities, generating endogenous impetus for reforming legislative objectives. The revised article 1 of the 2024 Mineral Resources Law, through systematic reconstruction, provides foundational legislative purpose support for the innovation of the mineral resources legal governance system. It serves as both the logical origin and value anchor point for constructing the mineral resources legal framework, representing a crucial institutional manifestation of China’s transition from traditional governance models to modern paradigms in mineral resource management. Article 1 of the new Mineral Resources Law establishes a progressive framework embedding “resource security” “environmental protection” and “equilibrium of rights and interests”. It contemporaneously optimizes foundational and strategic goals for mineral resource governance while outlining a comprehensive, multidimensional regulatory architecture. The paradigm shift in legislative objectives expands their functional role from declaratory principles to practical guidance, catalyzing systemic institutional evolution. Legislatively, it provides the value foundation for the internal institutional construction and external regulatory alignment of the Mineral Resources Law, guiding the systematic integration and dynamic adaptation of legal revisions while advancing the perfection and optimization of the mineral resource legal framework. Administratively, it establishes boundaries for administrative norms and enforcement authority, employs institutional safeguards to modernize enforcement mechanisms, and advances dual goals of effective governance and legal stability. Judicially, it ensures balanced interpretation of laws by reconciling uniform application with case-specific fairness, resolving conflicts through interest-balancing mechanisms that harmonize formal and substantive justice. Through legal education, it promotes legal literacy to optimize governance strategies and corporate compliance, fostering a collaborative framework where government decision-making and business operations are guided by lawful principles.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回