关于绿色矿山建设与ESG治理共同助力中国矿业高质量发展的思考

    Thoughts on the synergy between green mine construction and ESG governance in promoting the high-quality development of China’s mining industry

    • 摘要: ESG理念作为当今世界推动各行业企业实现可持续发展的重要引擎,正在全球范围内加速推广。具体到矿业行业,国内以“绿色矿山建设”作为矿业领域生态文明建设的重要抓手。本文聚焦绿色矿山建设与ESG治理赋能矿业企业的共同特点和显著差异,探讨二者的内在联系和协同机制,以期共同助力中国矿业企业高质量发展。研究结果表明:绿色矿山建设以政策刚性规范矿山全生命周期环境管理,ESG治理则通过市场机制量化企业可持续价值;二者虽在标准定位、评价对象、驱动机制、考核方法、考核时效、指标权重和适用场景方面存在差异,但均服务于矿业企业转型升级、风险管控与资金支持。协同机制方面,绿色矿山建设是体现有为政府的政策科学实践,ESG治理是反映有效市场的商业技术应用;绿色矿山建设为矿业企业“走出去”提供合规保障,ESG治理则为矿业企业“融进去”提供通用语言。结论指出,二者的协同既是“有为政府”与“有效市场”的深度耦合,也是破解矿业企业国际化进程中生态冲突和信任壁垒的核心抓手。建议从三方面推进协同发展:一是加快构建中国矿业ESG标准体系,衔接国际框架与本土实践;二是强化行业协会桥梁作用,推动政策宣导、案例共享与资源整合;三是鼓励企业统筹国内外标准,将绿色矿山建设成果转化为ESG竞争优势。

       

      Abstract: As a key engine driving sustainable development across industries worldwide, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles are gaining momentum globally. In the mining sector, China has positioned “green mine construction” as a key initiative to advance ecological civilization within the industry. This paper focuses on the shared characteristics and distinct differences between green mine construction and ESG governance in empowering mining enterprises, exploring their intrinsic connections and synergistic mechanisms. The goal is to jointly facilitate the high-quality development of China’s mining industry. This study reveals that green mine construction establishes policy regulations to standardize the environmental management throughout the entire life cycle of mining operations, while ESG governance quantifies corporate sustainability value through market-driven mechanisms. Although the two frameworks differ in their standard positioning, evaluation targets, driving mechanisms, assessment methodologies, evaluation timelines, indicator weighting, and applicable scenarios, both ultimately serve to facilitate the transformation and upgrading of mining enterprises, enhance risk management, and secure financial support. In terms of synergistic mechanisms, green mine construction represents a policy-driven scientific practice of a proactive government, while ESG reflects a commercial technical application of an efficient market. green mine construction provides compliance assurance for mining enterprises to “go global”, whereas ESG offers a universal language for them to “integrate into” international markets. The conclusion points out that the synergy between the two approaches represents both a deep symbiosis between a proactive government and an efficient market and a critical mechanism to address ecological conflicts and trust barriers in the internationalization of mining enterprises. It is suggested to promote synergistic development from three aspects. To accelerate the construction of ESG standard system of China’s mining industry, and connect international framework with local practice. To strengthen the bridging role of industry associations to facilitate policy advocacy, case-sharing, and resource integration. To encourage enterprises to harmonize domestic and global standards, transforming green mine achievements into ESG competitive advantages.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回