地下结构渗漏水病害特征统计分析

    Statistical analysis on leakage defects of underground engineering structures

    • 摘要: 为探究隧道渗漏水病害分布特征及其与工法的关联性,本文基于某市地铁运营隧道实测数据,系统开展了结构性渗漏水病害的统计分析与对比研究,旨在揭示不同施工条件下隧道渗漏水分布规律的差异性,为隧道结构健康评估与维护决策提供依据。研究采集了明挖法隧道、暗挖法隧道及盾构法隧道共计1万余处渗漏水样本,涵盖渗漏水类型、渗漏缝隙宽度及工法等多维度数据,通过频数统计,分析渗漏水类型构成特征、缝宽分布形态及其与工法的关联性。研究结果表明:①在病害类型方面,明挖法隧道与暗挖法隧道渗漏水病害类型构成相似,均以三缝渗漏(施工缝渗漏、变形缝渗漏及局部裂缝渗漏)为主,明挖法隧道与暗挖法隧道的三缝渗漏占比分别为94.60%、96.28%;盾构法隧道渗漏类型则呈现明显差异,盾构管片接缝渗漏与孔洞渗漏为主要类型,合计占比79.84%;②在缝宽分布方面,施工缝渗漏与裂缝渗漏宽度值主要分布在(0.2~1.5 mm区间,频次峰值出现在(0.4~0.7 mm段,该范围施工缝渗漏与裂缝渗漏占比分别为71.77%与76.44%;工法对缝宽分布无显著影响;③基于统计结果,以工法为父节点,渗漏水类型、渗漏水裂缝宽度等级和施工缝宽度等级为子节点,建立了简化的工法-渗漏水类型-渗漏水宽度等级的贝叶斯网络,可用于渗漏水病害的推理计算。研究证实不同施工工艺导致的衬砌结构特性差异是渗漏水病害类型与形态分异的重要原因。研究成果可为地铁隧道渗漏水防治提供工艺优化方向,指导病害防控重点布局,对病害风险分级和维护资源分配具有实用价值。

       

      Abstract: To investigate the distribution characteristics of tunnel leakages and their correlation with construction methods, statistical analysis and comparative research based on measured data from operational subway tunnels in a city is systematically conducted in this paper. The objective is to reveal the differences in leakage distribution patterns under various construction conditions, providing a basis for tunnel structural health assessment and maintenance decision-making. A total of over 10 000 leakage samples are collected from tunnels constructed using the cut-and-cover method, the mining method, and the shield tunneling method. These samples cover multidimensional data, including defect type classification, seepage gap width, and construction methods. Frequency statistics are used to identify the characteristics of leakage types, gap width distribution patterns, and their correlation with construction methods. The results show that: ①in terms of defect types, the distribution of leakage defects in cut-and-cover and mining method tunnels are similar, primarily consisting of leakage throw construction joints, expansion joints, and cracks, accounting for approximately 94.60% and 96.28% of the total, respectively. In contrast, shield tunneling tunnels exhibit distinct leakage types, with segment joint leakage and hole leakage being the main types, accounting for about 79.84% of the total. ②In terms of gap width distribution, the width of construction joint leakage and crack leakage are both distributed in the range of 0.2 mm to 1.5 mm, with a peak frequency occurring in the 0.4 mm to 0.7 mm range, which accounted for 71.77% and 76.44% of the total samples respectly for construction joint leakage and crack leakage. It is shown that construction method had no significant impact on the range of leakage gap widths. ③Based on the statistical results, a simplified Bayesian network is established, with construction methods as parent nodes and leakage types, leakage crack width grades, and construction joint width grades as child nodes. This network can be used for inference calculations related to leakage defects. The study confirm that differences in lining structure characteristics caused by different construction processes are important reasons for the variation in leakage defect types and forms. The findings provide directions for optimizing construction processes to prevent leakage in subway tunnels, guide the prioritization of defect prevention under different construction methods, and offer practical value for defect risk classification and maintenance resource allocation through its Bayesian association network.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回