美国关键矿产治理新态势与中国应对

    New trends of critical mineral governance in the United States and China’s response

    • 摘要: 关键矿产作为支撑新兴产业发展、能源结构转型与国家安全保障的战略性资源,已成为全球地缘政治博弈的关键抓手。近年来,美国不断强化其在关键矿产领域的战略部署,通过加强立法、政策引导及深化国际合作等多种手段,推动构建以自身为核心的全球关键矿产供应链体系,谋求在全球资源治理中的主导地位,并呈现出“排华”趋势。当前,美国关键矿产战略的推进正在引发三方面的深层次影响。一是国际矿产规则体系的重构。美国通过规避现有国际规则并向外输出单边治理标准,推动构建以本国利益为核心的关键矿产规则体系。二是全球矿产供应链格局的结构性调整。美国通过国家与企业协同强化“友岸化”与“近岸化”趋势,推动全球矿产供应链由效率导向转向安全导向。三是发展中国家资源主权博弈加剧。受美国影响,世界主要经济体争相拓展与矿产资源丰富的发展中国家的合作,资源民族主义风险随之上升,矿产治理中的主权博弈日益激烈。在此背景下,提升中国在关键矿产领域的治理能力已经成为当务之急。中国应从促进关键矿产法律体系升级、构建现代化矿业可持续发展体系及加强关键矿产全球治理话语权三个方面协同发力,通过制度升级与国际合作并进,为中国关键矿产安全提供更加稳固的战略支撑。

       

      Abstract: Critical minerals are recognized as strategic resources essential to the advancement of emerging industry, the transformation of energy structure, and the governance of national security, positioning them at the center of global geopolitical competition. In recent years, the United States continues to strengthen its strategic deployment in critical mineral fields, promoting the construction of a global critical mineral supply chain system centered on itself through various means such as strengthening legislation, policy guidance, and deepening international cooperation, seeking a leading position in global resource governance, and showing a trend of excluding China. Currently, the implementation of critical mineral strategies in the United States is producing profound impacts in three dimensions. Firstly, the international rule system governing mineral resources is being restructured. The United States promotes the construction of a critical mineral rules system centered on its own interests by avoiding existing international rules and exporting unilateral governance standards to the outside world. Secondly, a structural shift in the global mineral supply chain is taking place. The United States strengthens the trend of “friend-shoring” and “near-shoring” through national and corporate collaboration, promoting the global mineral supply chain to shift from efficiency oriented to safety oriented. Thirdly, resource sovereignty contests among developing countries are intensifying. Influenced by the United States, major economies around the world are eager to expand cooperation with mineral rich developing countries, leading to an increase in the risk of resource nationalism and an increasingly fierce sovereignty game in mineral governance. Against this backdrop, enhancing China’s governance capacity in the field of critical minerals has become imperative. China should make concerted efforts from three aspects: promoting the upgrading of the legal system for critical minerals, building a modern sustainable development system for mining, and strengthening the discourse power of global governance of key minerals. Through institutional upgrading and international cooperation, it can provide more stable strategic support for the security of China’s critical minerals.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回