CCS视角下孔隙空间管理的国际经验和中国路径

    International experience and Chinese pathways of pore space management from the perspective of CCS

    • 摘要: 碳捕集与封存(CCS)是实现减缓全球气候变化的关键手段,其中的关键环节是利用地下孔隙空间,将二氧化碳存储于地质构造中(GCS),实现永久封存。部分发达国家已对孔隙空间的概念定义、权利归属进行了广泛研究,建立并完善相关管理制度,中国相关制度建设滞后,亟需借鉴国际经验。本文通过文献和政策跟踪研究,系统综述了孔隙空间的地质学定义与法律政策定义,分析空间类、用途类、地质类三种定义类型的特点和问题。总结分析孔隙空间归属地表土地所有者、矿业权所有者和国家所有的现状和各国孔隙空间管理机构的类型,探讨各类权属模式的利弊和未来发展趋势。梳理了以勘探权、封存权为代表的“类矿产”配置方式和以通行权、单元化为代表的混合配置方式。基于中国政策管理现状和法规制度特点进行情景分析,探讨不同孔隙空间管理模式的利弊和最优路径。研究认为,应尽快制定相关国家/行业标准,统一孔隙空间及二氧化碳封存储层定义,明确国家拥有孔隙空间所有权,并由自然资源主管部门统筹管理,参照矿业权设定孔隙空间“勘探权”和“封存权”,制定孔隙空间开发利用的优先级规则,以构建适应碳中和目标的孔隙空间管理体系,推动CCS产业发展。

       

      Abstract: Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key approach to mitigating global climate change, with the crucial step being the utilization of underground pore space to store carbon dioxide in geological formations (GCS) for permanent sequestration. Some developed countries have conducted extensive research on the concept and rights of pore space, establishing and improving relevant management systems. However, China's related system construction lags behind and urgently needs to draw on international experience. Through literature and policy tracking research, this paper systematically reviews the geological and legal policy definitions of pore space, analyzes the characteristics and problems of the three types of definitions: spatial, usage, and geological. It summarizes and analyzes the current situation of pore space ownership by surface landowners, mining rights holders, and the state, as well as the types of pore space management institutions in various countries, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various ownership models and their future development trends. It sorts out the "mineral-like" allocation methods represented by exploration rights and storage rights, as well as the mixed allocation methods represented by passage rights and unitization. Based on the current policy management situation and regulatory characteristics in China, it conducts scenario analysis to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different pore space management models and the optimal path. The study suggests that relevant national/industry standards should be formulated as soon as possible to unify the definitions of pore space and carbon dioxide storage reservoirs, clarify that the state owns the ownership of pore space, and be managed by the natural resources authorities in a coordinated manner. Pore space "exploration rights" and "storage rights" should be set up by referring to mining rights, and priority rules for the development and utilization of pore space should be formulated to build a pore space management system that adapts to the carbon neutrality goal and promote the development of the CCS industry.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回