综采沿空巷道顶板非对称变形及支护特性研究

    Study on asymmetric deformation and support characteristics of roof in fully mechanized gob-side roadway

    • 摘要: 综采沿空巷道顶板表现出沿中心轴两侧变形和应力分布沿巷道中心线方向非对称分布特性,因此,超前支架群组支撑力与顶板应力分布不匹配成为亟待解决的问题。基于FLAC3D采用强度折减模拟方法模拟上个工作面采空区,对不同支护策略沿空巷道顶板位移、应力进行分析,研究结果表明:①锚固支护策略支护作用下巷道顶板的位移量、应力均呈现出顶板中轴线两端的非对称分布特性。②等强度耦合支护策略相较锚固支护策略,顶板最大位移量减少28.8%,最大位移位置向顶板中线靠近9.2%,最大垂直应力减少25.26%,但在控制顶板应力的非对称特性具有一定的局限性,并且伴有在巷道深处过度支护现象。③横纵向联合非等强度耦合支护策略相较等强度耦合支护策略,顶板最大位移量减少13.2%,最大位置距离顶板中线减少0.26 m,沿巷道走向方向顶板变形趋于平缓;巷道顶板两端差值平均减少32.98%,最大垂直应力值减少26.8%,距离顶板中线距离平均减少27.4%。研究结果可为沿空巷道顶板复杂应力稳定控制提供参考。

       

      Abstract: The deformation and stress in the roof of gob-side roadway along fully mechanized mining face demonstrates asymmetric distribution characteristics relatives to the central axis, with asymmetric characteristics along the lead hammer direction. Consequently, here is an urgent need to address the mismatch between the support force of the advance support group and the stress distribution of the roof. Using FLAC3D with the strength reduction simulation method, this paper analyzes the displacement and stress of the roof under various support strategies. Our findings reveal that under the anchoring support strategy, both displacement and stress exhibit asymmetric distribution characteristics at both ends of central axis of the roof. In comparison, the equal strength coupling support strategy reduces the maximum displacement of the roof by 28.8%, brings the maximum displacement position closer to the central line by 9.2%, and decreases the maximum vertical stress by 25.26%. However, limitations in controlling the asymmetric characteristics of the roof stress are observed, with instances of excessive support in the deep sections of the roadway. Furthermore, the transverse and longitudinal joint non-equal strength coupling support strategy, when compared to the equal strength coupling support, reduces the maximum displacement of the roof by 13.2%, decreases the distance from the maximum position to the central line of the roof by 0.26 m, and leads to gentler deformation along the roadway direction. Additionally, it decreases the average difference between the two ends of the roadway roof by 32.98%, reduces the maximum vertical stress value by 26.8 %, and decreases the average distance from the central line of the roof by 27.4%. These research findings offer valuable insights for effectively controlling complex stress along the roof of an empty roadway.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回