基于WLs的二维地球化学景观多重分形建模

    Multifractal modeling of 2D geochemical landscape based on Wavelet Leaders

    • 摘要: 作为非线性、复杂性理论的重要领域之一,多重分形理论所提供的奇异性、广义自相似性、分形谱系等概念和相关模型,不仅能够客观的描述成矿系统、成矿过程、成矿富集规律,还提供了定量模拟和识别成矿异常的有效模型。本文从小波系数的角度出发,与目前惯用的盒子测度法对比,进行多重分形分析,从原理上来看前者是基于复杂系统中的概率测度值的积分,而后者是基于信号测度域的差分。验证数据分别来自经典矿物分割模型De Wijs模型和云南个旧水系沉积物Sn、Cu和Pb元素富集值。结果表明,基于盒子测度法在小尺度的地球化学数据方面表现出了比WLs(Wavelet leaders,WLs)更高的稳定性以及优越性,但是对于大尺度的数据,两者的分析结果相同,我们有理由相信对于小尺度、奇异域窄、低震荡和高频交叠数据,基于WLs的分析手段会造成比较大的误差。基于WLs的多重分形分析手段对于严重依赖方法和数据本身的多重分析手段来说,可以作为一种选择。

       

      Abstract: As one field in nonlinear sciences, It has been demonstrated that the concepts and models relevant to multifractal theory are useful not only for characterizing the fundamental properties of non-linearity of the mineralization processes, the singular distribution of mineral deposits and ore element concentrations in mineral districts, but also for singularity analysis and anomaly delineation. This paper compares the box-counting moment based multifractal method with a newly developed wavelet leaders moment based multifractal method. The former is based on the technique characterized by the form of integrals or sums concerned with probability measures usually used in dynamical systems, while the latter by increments with formulated multiscale functions used in turbulence signals. Both deterministic and random multiplicative cascade synthetic images and geochemical landscapes created form Gejiu mineral district of southern China were chosen to demonstrate the fact that by convention both two methods assumed a biased estimation for scaling singularity exponents and spectra and exhibit large uncertainties for various datasets. The selective and filtering behavior caused from wavelet leaders directly lead to lots of smaller values compared to the measures basis, and thus, by moment generating process which offers us an unstable estimation. As for the characteristic of wavelet transform, we have the reasons to believe that the similar behavior could existed in those signals which owned the properties such as small sample sizes, short scaling range, low fluctuation and high frequency superimposition, and so on, whereas for those signals owned large sample size and abruptly changes, the wavelet leaders method could be an efficient tools for multifractal analysis. In addition the introduction of wavelet leaders based multifractal method could complement by the original scaling system and estimation procedures in the geological field aimed at interpreting geological phenomenon.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回