樊翔, 白中科, 朱楚馨, 许文佳. 参照区对比法在美国矿区土地复垦评价体系中的应用及对中国的启示[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(3): 92-100. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.03.032
    引用本文: 樊翔, 白中科, 朱楚馨, 许文佳. 参照区对比法在美国矿区土地复垦评价体系中的应用及对中国的启示[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(3): 92-100. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.03.032
    FAN Xiang, BAI Zhongke, ZHU Chuxin, XU Wenjia. Application of reference area in US land reclamation assessment system and its implications for China[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2021, 30(3): 92-100. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.03.032
    Citation: FAN Xiang, BAI Zhongke, ZHU Chuxin, XU Wenjia. Application of reference area in US land reclamation assessment system and its implications for China[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2021, 30(3): 92-100. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.03.032

    参照区对比法在美国矿区土地复垦评价体系中的应用及对中国的启示

    Application of reference area in US land reclamation assessment system and its implications for China

    • 摘要: 与西方发达国家相比,我国矿区土地复垦管理与评价体系建立较晚,在植被重建质量评价方面缺少对参照区(reference area)的应用。本文系统梳理了参照区在美国土地复垦评价体系中的应用,并剖析了该方法在理论与实践方面的优缺点,介绍了美国复垦评价体系在过去几十年中对这些缺点的改进,旨在为进一步完善我国土地复垦质量评价体系提供参考。参照区是能代表拟损毁区立地条件和植被情况的、不受采矿扰动的土地单元,用以测度自然条件下或农业生产方式下的植被覆盖度、生产力和植物物种多样性,被当作判断植被重建是否成功的基准。在美国联邦和各州矿区复垦管理与评价体系中,参照区的建立、维护与使用贯穿采前区域基础信息调查、采矿证申请,采中土地管理,以及复垦后的植被重建质量评价。历史上,学界对参照区对比法的质疑主要有:在理论层面,复垦区与参照区在演替阶段和方向上存在差异,二者可比性存疑;在应用层面,参照区面积有限,难以体现植物群落的空间异质性;参照区对比法不够灵活;参照区可能退化等。然而,以上问题都得到了不同程度的解决。由于能够自动校正植被年际变化对评价带来的影响,省去了制定技术标准所需的大量历史数据,参照区对比法成为了美国应用最广泛的植被重建质量评价方法。该评价方法较我国现行复垦区植被重建评价方法有明显优势,对于进一步完善我国土地复垦管理与评价体系具有重要的借鉴意义。

       

      Abstract: Compared with developed countries, China's management and evaluation system for mined land reclamation was built late, and the use of reference area is absent.This paper introduces the application of reference area in land reclamation management and evaluation system of US, and its advantages and disadvantages in both theory and practice, aiming to provide a reference for reclamation research and policy making in China.Reference area means a land unit maintained under appropriate management for the purpose of measuring vegetation ground cover, productivity and plant species diversity that are produced naturally or by crop production methods approved by the regulatory authority.Reference areas must be representative of geology, soil, slope, and vegetation in the permit area.According to US federal and state regulations, reference area should be established during baseline survey, and its vegetation information, location and boundaries is required for mining permit applications.During mining and reclamation periods, the reference area should be under proper management, to ensure the usability for measuring success of revegetation.Revegetation standards based on reference area were questioned both theoretically and practically.Conceptually, the reclaimed and reference areas may be different in both succession stage and trajectory, making the comparability doubtable.Practically, vegetation on the small area of reference area could not be representative the vegetation on the reclaimed area, which can be many times larger.And the reference area may suffer from degradation during mining and reclamation periods.However, most of these drawbacks have been solved.As standards based on reference area can automatically adjust temporal variability of vegetation, dispensing with huge data accumulation, it has become the most widely used standards for measuring revegetation success.It has advantages compared with our current revegetation standards of land reclamation, providing an important reference for improving our land reclamation quality standards.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回