张宁宁, 王建良, 刘明明, 王建君, 王青, 赵喆, 吴义平, 曹庆超. 碳中和目标下欧美国际石油公司低碳转型差异性原因探讨及启示[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(9): 8-15. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.09.025
    引用本文: 张宁宁, 王建良, 刘明明, 王建君, 王青, 赵喆, 吴义平, 曹庆超. 碳中和目标下欧美国际石油公司低碳转型差异性原因探讨及启示[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(9): 8-15. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.09.025
    ZHANG Ningning, WANG Jianliang, LIU Mingming, WANG Jianjun, WANG Qing, ZHAO Zhe, WU Yiping, CAO Qingchao. Discussion and enlightenments on the causes of differences in low carbon transformation of European and American international oil companies under the goal of carbon neutrality[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2021, 30(9): 8-15. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.09.025
    Citation: ZHANG Ningning, WANG Jianliang, LIU Mingming, WANG Jianjun, WANG Qing, ZHAO Zhe, WU Yiping, CAO Qingchao. Discussion and enlightenments on the causes of differences in low carbon transformation of European and American international oil companies under the goal of carbon neutrality[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2021, 30(9): 8-15. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2021.09.025

    碳中和目标下欧美国际石油公司低碳转型差异性原因探讨及启示

    Discussion and enlightenments on the causes of differences in low carbon transformation of European and American international oil companies under the goal of carbon neutrality

    • 摘要: 自《巴黎协定》以来,世界各主要经济体的碳中和承诺加快了全球应对气候变化的步伐,作为传统含碳能源的生产供应商,石油公司的低碳转型发展备受关注。本文以全球化石能源行业中最具代表性的欧美国际大型石油公司为主要研究对象,通过梳理其低碳转型的背景及实践,系统分析了国际石油公司的转型路径差异性原因。研究发现:①欧美国际石油公司均顺应时代要求,提出自身的碳中和或碳减排目标,助力企业低碳转型;②在转型意愿与转型路径的具体选择上,欧美国际石油公司存在显著差异,欧洲各国选择大力投资新能源、走超越石油发展之路,而美国石油公司选择投资高碳能源低碳化利用技术、走降低石油开发利用的碳排放之路;③欧美国际石油公司所处国家气候应对政策的强度、公司对能源系统低碳转型速度与规模的认知、公司所处地区油气市场特征、投资者环保意愿及公司对长短期收益的关注与权衡取舍等方面的差异是欧美国际石油公司转型路径差异的四大主要因素。研究结果通过分析总结欧美国际石油公司低碳转型情况,以期为我国石油公司低碳转型发展提供思路。

       

      Abstract: Since the Paris Agreement, the carbon neutrality commitment of the world’s major economies has accelerated the pace of global response to climate change.As a provider of traditional carbon energy, the low-carbon transformation and development of oil companies has attracted much attention.Taking the most representative European and American international large oil companies in the global fossil energy industry as the main research object, this paper systematically analyzes the reasons for the differences in the transformation paths of international oil companies by combing their low-carbon transformation background and practice.The results show that European and American oil companies comply with the requirements of the times and put forward their own carbon neutralization or carbon emission reduction targets to help enterprises with low-carbon transformation.There are significant differences between European and American oil companies in the specific choice of transformation willingness and transformation path.European countries choose to invest heavily in new energy and take the road beyond oil development, while American oil companies choose to invest in high-carbon energy and low-carbon utilization technology and take the road of reducing carbon emissions from oil development and utilization.The differences in the strength of the national climate response policies of European and American oil companies, the company’s understanding of the speed and scale of low-carbon transformation of the energy system, the characteristics of the oil and gas market in the region where the company is located, the willingness of investors to protect the environment and the company’s attention and trade-offs on long-term and short-term earnings are the four main factors for the differences in the transformation paths of European and American oil companies.The research results analyze and summarize the low-carbon transformation of European and American oil companies, in order to provide ideas for the development of low-carbon transformation of Chinese oil companies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回