郭亚奔, 张晓, 史久林, 李立, 胡滨, 顾士超. 煤柱-充填体联合控制地表变形规律研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2022, 31(12): 138-145. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2022.12.018
    引用本文: 郭亚奔, 张晓, 史久林, 李立, 胡滨, 顾士超. 煤柱-充填体联合控制地表变形规律研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2022, 31(12): 138-145. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2022.12.018
    GUO Yaben, ZHANG Xiao, SHI Jiulin, LI Li, HU Bin, GU Shichao. Study on surface deformation law of coal pillar-filling combined control[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2022, 31(12): 138-145. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2022.12.018
    Citation: GUO Yaben, ZHANG Xiao, SHI Jiulin, LI Li, HU Bin, GU Shichao. Study on surface deformation law of coal pillar-filling combined control[J]. CHINA MINING MAGAZINE, 2022, 31(12): 138-145. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2022.12.018

    煤柱-充填体联合控制地表变形规律研究

    Study on surface deformation law of coal pillar-filling combined control

    • 摘要:

      针对矿区建筑物下煤炭资源回收困难、工作面正常生产和接续困难、地表变形大等问题,以阿尔巴斯二矿采用逐巷胶结充填方法为背景,利用FLAC3D模拟软件和采煤沉陷预计分析软件,对比研究不同煤柱宽度(6 m、12 m、18 m、24 m)留设时,以煤矸石、粉煤灰为骨料胶结料浆充实率的变化对地表变形规律及充填体内部应力分布特征的影响。研究结果表明:保护煤柱与胶结充填体联合控制可有效减少上覆岩层沉降,但以煤柱为中心的地表下沉并未呈现完全“非对称”分布,且有随煤柱宽度增大而逐渐显现盆地“平底”现象的趋势。垂直应力在充填体中部达到峰值(21.85 MPa),递减趋势向两侧扩展;联合控制最优方案为保护煤柱12 m,充实率85%,此时地面构筑物变形(ε≤1.4 mm/m,i≤2.4 mm/m)满足地表建(构)筑物保护等级Ⅰ级设防标准,与6 m保护煤柱相比,地表水平移动值由4.72 mm降低到2.78 mm,降幅达到41.10%。

       

      Abstract:

      Aiming at the problems of coal resource recovery under buildings in mining area, difficulty in normal production and continuation of working face and large surface deformation, based on the roadway-by-roadway cemented filling method in Albas No.2 Coal Mine, FLAC3D simulation software and mining subsidence prediction analysis software are used to compare and study the influence of the change of the filling rate of cemented slurry with coal gangue and fly ash as aggregate on the surface deformation law and the internal stress distribution characteristics of the filling body when different coal pillar widths (6 m, 12 m, 18 m and 24 m) are retained.The results show that the combined control of protective coal pillar and cemented backfill can effectively reduce the subsidence of overlying strata, but the surface subsidence centered on the coal pillar does not show a completely “asymmetric” distribution and tends to gradually show a “flat bottom” phenomenon with the increase of coal pillar width.The vertical stress peaked in the middle of the filling body (21.85 MPa), and the decreasing trend extended to both sides.The optimal scheme of combined control is that the protective coal pillar is 12 m and the filling rate is 85%.At this time, the deformation of the ground structure (ε≤1.4 mm/m, i≤2.4 mm/m) meets the Class I fortification standard of surface building (structure) protection.Compared with the 6 m protective coal pillar, the horizontal movement value of the surface is reduced from 4.72 mm to 2.78 mm, with a decrease of 41.10%.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回