美国关键矿产联盟进展与启示: 以矿产安全伙伴关系为例

    Progress and insights of the U.S. Critical Mineral Alliance: a case study of the mineral security partnership

    • 摘要: 在全球能源转型和科技与产业革命快速演进的背景下,关键矿产作为基础原材料的战略地位日益凸显,引发了各国对关键矿产产业链供应链的激烈竞争。美国、欧盟、英国、澳大利亚、加拿大、日本、韩国等发达国家为保障关键矿产供应链稳定,建立了数十个双多边关键矿产联盟,其中,矿产安全伙伴关系(MSP)是美国和欧盟等国家全球关键矿产战略实施框架的核心,其覆盖范围广泛,进展显著且产生的影响较大。美欧国家通过矿产安全伙伴关系已经构建了关键矿产供应链多层级的网络,其内容涵盖了所有关键矿产及其供应链和价值链,并配套了融合财政、外交、法律等多层面的保障措施,在此机制下推动实施了多批关键矿产项目。美欧国家意图通过矿产安全伙伴关系推动关键矿产供应体系向阵营化和碎片化发展,在西方价值观体系下设置了一套资源治理准则,并在资源国家全力推行,抬高了关键矿产投资壁垒,将进一步加剧全球关键矿产竞争态势。基于对美欧关键矿产联盟的全面分析,提出了中国从构建包容发展的多边合作框架,争夺可持续发展的话语权高地,提升与资源国家产业链发展互利水平等应对大国关键矿产竞争,提升全球关键矿产供应链稳定的对策建议。

       

      Abstract: In the context of the rapid evolution of global energy transition and technology and industry, the strategic position of critical minerals as fundamental raw materials has become increasingly prominent, leading to intense competition among countries for the supply chains of the critical minerals industry. Developed countries such as the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Japan, and South Korea have established dozens of bilateral and multilateral critical minerals alliances to ensure the stability of their critical minerals supply chains. Among them, the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP) is the core of the global critical minerals strategy implementation framework for countries like the United States and the European Union, with a wide coverage, significant progress, and considerable impact. The US and European countries have built a multi-level network of critical mineral supply chains through the MSP, covering all critical minerals list and their supply and value chains, complemented by multi-faceted safeguard measures integrating finance, diplomacy, and law, under which they have promoted the implementation of numerous critical mineral projects. The US and European countries intend to use the MSP to drive the supply system of critical minerals towards blocization and fragmentation, setting a set of resource governance standards under the Western value system and vigorously promoting them in resource countries, raising the barriers to investment in critical minerals, and further intensifying the global competition for critical minerals. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the US and European critical mineral alliances, suggestions have been proposed to address the competition for critical minerals among major powers and to enhance the stability of the global critical mineral supply chain. These suggestions include building a multilateral cooperation framework for inclusive development, striving for a high ground in sustainable development discourse, and improving the mutually beneficial level of industrial chain development with resource countries.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回